Dátum poslednej aktualizácie:20.12.2023
Monitoring / Reports
EU Member States are obliged to continuously monitor and report on the conservation status of species of Community importance(pursuant to the Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - the EU Habitats Directive) to the European Commission every 6 years.
Pursuant to Art. 17 of the Habitats Directive, they are required to prepare a report on the implementation of the measures taken in accordance with the Directive, including an assessment of the impacts of those measures on the conservation status of Annex I habitats and Annex II species.
The first Report on the Status of Habitats and Species of Community importance for Slovakia was prepared and submitted to the EC in 2007 (for first assessment cycle / reporting period 2004 – 2006), second in 2013 (for period 2007 – 2012) and third in 2019 (for period 2013 – 2018).
The assessment, prepared every 6 years for reporting purposes, synthesises data that are systematically collected at national level from various sources, mainly monitoring. However, other data are also taken into account, such as occurrence data collected by random observations by experts on particular groups of plants and animals. It should be taken into account that the data from the reporting itself assesses a broader set of parameters compared to the assessments that are continuously reported and evaluated in the framework of systematic monitoring of habitats and species of Community importancein Slovakia. For this reason, when using these data, it is always necessary to look at these data separately (reporting and monitoring) and there may be slight differences and variances between these data resulting from the completeness of the set of parameters assessed as well as from differences in the assessment methodologies of the two datasets.
Species
The indicator is based on the results of this reporting (from the so-called assessment reports), as well as on the continuous monitoring data of 150 species of animals and 50 plant species of CI at the level of the Slovak Republic within the framework of the Comprehensive Information and Monitoring System operated by the SOP SR, of which 5 species do not occur in the long term and only abbreviated information about them is provided.
The indicator offers an overall assessment of species as well as by their respective groups:
Total plants |
Higher plants |
Bryophytes |
Total animals |
Mammals |
Reptiles |
Amphibians |
Fish |
Crustacea |
Molluscs |
Odonata |
Annelida |
Butterflies |
Orthoptera |
Coleoptera |
Conservation status
EU Member States must monitor and report the conservation status of species of EI (Annex II, IV, V of the Directive). The conservation status is expressed in three 'traffic light' categories ('Favourable (FV)' – green, 'unfavourable - unsatisfactory (U1)' – orange, 'unfavourable - bad (U2)' – red, plus unknown (XX) – grey).
The indicator is based on the number of species in these categories and changes between the individual categories over the time.
The indicator is formed on the basis of valid European methodologies by aggregating large sets of data obtained within the monitoring of species at SR level.
The results of the 3rd CI species assessment in Slovakia were published in the document:
Černecký, J., Čuláková, J., Ďuricová, V., Saxa, A., Andráš, P., Ulrych, L., Šuvada, R., Galvánková, J., Lešová, A., Havranová, I. 2020. Report on the status of habitats and species of Community importance for the period 2013-2018 in the Slovak Republic. Banská Bystrica: ŠOP SR, 109 pp, ISBN 978-80-8184-076-0.
More information from the reporting results can be found on the website:
http://www.sopsr.sk/natura/dokumenty/Monografia_reporting_art17_2013_2018.pdf
All related reports are published on the SNC SR website:
(http://www.sopsr.sk/natura/index1.php?p=15&lang=sk).
Greener Slovakia – Strategy of the Environmental Policy of the Slovak Republic until 2030 (Envirostrategy 2030) (2019)
Slovakia will prevent the deterioration of protected species and habitats.
2.1 Stopping the Loss of Biodiversity
Climate Change Adaptation Strategy of the Slovak Republic - Update (2018)
Proposed ecosystem-based biodiversity adaptation measures:
The updated National Biodiversity Strategy up to 2020 (2014)
Action plan for implementation of measures resulting from the updated National Biodiversity Strategy up to 2020 (2014)
Area A Nature protection
Objective C.4
Change since 2005 | Change since 2015 | Last year-on-year change |
---|---|---|
Compared to the previous evaluation periods, there was an improvement in knowledge and the consequent deterioration of the habitats, but in fact their condition is more or less the same. | Compared to the previous evaluation periods, knowledge improved again in 2019, in fact the state of the habitats remains more or less the same, namely unfavorable. | The conservation status of habitats of European interest is evaluated in 6-year intervals as part of the reporting for the EC. However, according to the records from KIMS (ongoing monitoring), it can be concluded that their condition has not changed significantly. |
The Habitats Directive (Council Directive no.92/43/EEC on the Protection of natural habitats, wild animals and plants) implies also species protection for selected taxa of plants and animals, including the obligation to monitor the conservation status of species listed in the Annexes to the Directive (species of European importance (EI)).
The new report for 2013 – 2018 is primarily based on KIMS data, which has significantly reduced the number of unknown assessments of the status of habitats and species of European interest.
It contains comprehensive information on population sizes, future prospects, mapped distribution, impacts and threats, and other important parameters. Overall, 150 species of animals and 50 species of plants were assessed, of which 5 species have not occurred in the long term and only short information about them is provided.
Comparison of the conservation status of 9 groups of CI species between 2007, 2013 and 2019 reports
Year of assessment |
Taxonomic group |
FV |
XX |
U1 |
U2 |
2007 |
Lower plants 2007 |
|
7 |
4 |
|
2013 |
Lower plants 2013 |
|
5 |
6 |
|
2019 |
Lower plants (11) 2019 |
3 |
|
6 |
2 |
2007 |
Higher plants 2007 |
13 |
3 |
23 |
19 |
2013 |
Higher plants 2013 |
11 |
|
27 |
18 |
2019 |
Higher plants (56) 2019 |
18 |
|
31 |
7 |
2007 |
Molluscs 2007 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2013 |
Molluscs 2013 |
5 |
|
6 |
1 |
2019 |
Molluscs (12) 2019 |
1 |
|
9 |
2 |
2007 |
Annelida 2007 |
|
|
1 |
|
2013 |
Annelida 2013 |
1 |
|
|
|
2019 |
Annelida (1) 2019 |
|
|
1 |
|
2007 |
Arthropods 2007 |
21 |
21 |
14 |
22 |
2013 |
Arthropods 2013 |
36 |
8 |
18 |
16 |
2019 |
Arthropods (81) 2019 |
3 |
|
56 |
22 |
2007 |
Fish 2007 |
5 |
32 |
3 |
|
2013 |
Fish 2013 |
5 |
10 |
18 |
6 |
2019 |
Fish (42) 2019 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
23 |
2007 |
Amphibians 2007 |
1 |
1 |
17 |
6 |
2013 |
Amphibians 2013 |
1 |
1 |
17 |
6 |
2019 |
Amphibians (25) 2019 |
3 |
1 |
15 |
6 |
2007 |
Reptiles 2007 |
4 |
|
10 |
1 |
2013 |
Reptiles 2013 |
|
|
10 |
5 |
2019 |
Reptiles (15) 2019 |
|
|
14 |
1 |
2007 |
Mammals 2007 |
4 |
36 |
26 |
14 |
2013 |
Mammals 2013 |
4 |
36 |
28 |
11 |
2019 |
Mammals (83) 2019 |
46 |
1 |
29 |
7 |
Lower plants
A comparison of the overall assessments of lower plants between reporting periods shows that knowledge of all species in this group has improved due to the introduction of systematic monitoring (since 2013), as none are rated in unknown status (XX). Out of a total of 11 assessments, 3 species are in favourable condition – Dicranum viride (ALP), Buxbaumia viridis (ALP) a Leucobryum glaucum (PAN). 50% of the assessments are in unfavourable condition.
Estimated average population size of 9 species of lower EI plants in Slovakia
Mannia triandra |
individuals |
16 606 |
Dicranum viride |
area |
1,8 m2 |
Buxbaumia viridis |
area |
133,0 m2 |
Leucobryum glaucum |
individuals |
359 957 |
Sphagnum spp. |
individuals |
10 655 000 |
Ochyraea tatrensis |
area |
20–50 m2 |
Hamatocaulis vernicosus |
area |
99,5 m2 |
Scapania carinthiaca |
area |
0 m2 |
Tortella rigens |
výmera |
0 m2 |
Source: SNC SR
Higher plants
Currently, we have a record of the occurrence of 42 taxa of higher EI plants in Slovakia, of which one taxon – common club moss (Lycopodium spp.) aggregates 6 species. The discovery of a new locality of the Thesium ebracteatum is a positive, as it was until recently considered extinct in Slovakia, and this new locality has been included in the national list of SCIs. Plant species which occur in the Alpine biogeographical region (central and northern part of Slovakia) have a better conservation status, which results from less disturbance of the natural environment.
The most threatened species of the group include the Eleocharis carniolica, marsh gladiolus (Gladiolus palustris), four leaf clover (Marsilea quadrifolia) and fen orchid (Liparis loeseli) assessed in U2 status because they are dependent on the specific water regime of their habitats. Due to the limited number of sites of occurrence or low population numbers, they are one of the most endangered species (U2) Iris humilis subsp. arenaria (1 site in SCI Čenkov), Klasea lycopifolia (1 site in SCI Žalostiná), four leaf clover Marsilea quadrifolia (only sites in SCI Latorica). As a “specialist” can also be considered the species evaluated in U1 status, Asplenium adulterinum, which requires specific conditions of the geological substrate and microclimate – it occurs only on serpentine rocks, where it grows on bare rocks and semi-shaded crevices.
Some species of the alpine zone in Slovakia are in favourable condition, e.g. Tatra scurvy-grass (Cochlearia tatrae), white genepì (Artemisia eriantha), or certain species whose range is restricted exclusively to the territory of Slovakia – Cyclamen fatrense, Thlaspi jankae, Daphne arbuscula and grow precisely in areas with an adequate degree of protection and category of protected areas, which provide them with suitable conditions for their long-term survival.
The following graphs show the average estimated population sizes of higher plant species, calculated from 2019 reporting data.
Estimated average population size of selected species of higher EI plants in Slovakia
Source: SNC SR
Estimated average population size of selected species of higher EI plants in Slovakia
Source: SNC SR
Estimated average population size of selected species of higher EI plants in Slovakia
Source: SNC SR
Invertebrates
In the 2019 reporting, 16 butterfly species were assessed, with up to 78% of butterfly assessments in unfavourable - unsatisfactory condition and only 7% in favourable condition. This is a significant downgrade from the 2013 reporting due to the use of more accurate data on these species and their habitats obtained from systematic monitoring. The most threatened species include Lopinga achine and Colias myrmidone.
A total of 15 beetle species of European interest were also assessed, of which up to 94% are in unfavourable condition. Although the knowledge about them has improved, their status in the wild in Slovakia is alarming and it is necessary to develop measures for their improvement. The most endangered species include Boros schneideri, Carabus hungaricus and Bolbelasmus unicornis.
In the dragonfly group, 6 species were assessed in the 2019 reporting and a new species Leucorrhinia caudalis was added, which occurs only in one sites in the Slovak Republic. All reported dragonfly species were assessed to be in unfavourable condition, however, this is not considered a deterioration from the 2013 reporting, but a better quality data base from regular monitoring.
The group of orthoptera is represented by 7 EI species. In the 2019 reporting, the species Isophia costata (U2 ALP) was added, which occurs at 1 site in Slovakia. Other U2 species include Saga pedo and Paracaloptenus caloptenoides. Compared to the 2013 reporting results, species knowledge has improved, with all reported species in unfavourable condition.
Of the 7 species of molluscs reported, only 1 species is in favourable condition (Roman snail, Helix pomatia). The remaining assessments are unfavourable – up to 2/3 of the assessed species are in unfavourable - unsatisfactory condition. Vertigo moulinsiana and Vertigo angustior are assessed as being in poor condition in the Pannonian biogeographical region. The most serious negative impacts are interference with the water regime, wetland drainage and over-fertilisation, as well as intensive grazing and eutrophication.
Of the two crayfish species assessed (Astacus astacus, Austropotamobius torrentium), one is in poor and one in unsatisfactory condition. Changes in the hydrological regime, pollution from agricultural activities (e.g. pesticides, contaminated sludge, wastewater – silage runoff) and invasive species pose the biggest threats to crayfish.
Of the large number of 44 arthropod EI species, the Bolbelasmus unicornis and the Danube clouded yellow (Colias myrmidone) are in poor condition in both bioregions. Some beetle species bound to dead wood are also in poor condition. The overall status of EI butterflies in Slovakia is unfavourable (up to 90% of their status assessments are unsatisfactory or poor).
Vertebrate
Out of 40 assessments (23 species) of reptiles and amphibians of EI in Slovakia, only 3 assessments are favourable for the species Pelophylax ridibundus (FV ALP/PAN) and Ablepharus kitaibelii (FV PAN). Overall, up to 90% of the assessments are unfavourable, which also reflects the negative status of the habitats in which these species live. The U1 status of most representatives of this group is unchanged since the first reporting in 2007. The species Emys orbicularis has a minimum number of reproductive sites in Slovakia, therefore the priority is to implement the measures of the conservation programme for this species in the field of legislation, monitoring, but especially practical care of water bodies where the turtle occurs.
In the 2019 reporting, 24 species of EI fish and lamprey were assessed. Acipenser ruthenus was also reported for the first time in the Danube River. Apart from two species in favourable status - Lampetra planeri (FV ALP) and Rhodeus amarus (FV PAN), three species in unknown status – Eudontomyzon mariae (XX PAN) and Eudontomyzon vladykovi (XX PAN/ALP), the rest of the species are in unfavourable status mainly due to taxonomic uncertainties. Compared to 2013, however, the knowledge about them has improved. There is an alarming situation with some formerly common fish species (huchen, grayling, barbel), populations of which are now threatened mainly by the regulation of streams, the construction of barriers (small hydropower plants) and the predation of the great cormorant.
The 48 mammal species assessed are the best studied group of animals in Slovakia. Exceptions include 28 species of bats and some species of rodents recorded in our country. A positive trend was observed for the following species: European bison (Bison bonasus), Tatra chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra tatrica), Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber), Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra), brown bear (Ursus arctos) and gray wolf (Canis lupus). A negative trend was assessed for the following species: forest dormouse (Dryomys nitedula), Central European tundra vole (Microtus oeconomus mehelyi),Tatra tundra vole (Microtus tatricus), steppe polecat (Mustela eversmanii), European polecat (Mustela putorius) and European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus). The status of most bat species was assessed as favourable, a change from the 2013 reporting where up to 75% of assessments were in unknown status.
Trend assessment
Comparison of the trend in the unfavourable status of EI species
Assessment by biogeographical region
Overall assessment of the status of EI species by biogeographical regions of Slovakia for the period 2013 – 2018
The Slovak Republic has also submitted to the European Commission a report on exemptions under Article 16 of the Habitats Directive (for the years 2017 – 2018). Report is available on the following website https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/habides/
Assessment of the conservation satus of EI species according to KIMS (as of 2022)
In 2022, 1,848 field visits of permanent monitoring sites were conducted under KIMS.
According to continuous monitoring results from KIMS, as of 2022, 26% species of EI were in a favourable condition, 48.5% species of EI in an unsatisfactory condition and 25.5% of species of EI in a bad condition.
Conservation status of EI species according to taxonomic groups in 2022 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
Total plants |
47.6 |
33.7 |
18.7 |
Higher plants |
51.0 |
36.3 |
12.7 |
Bryophytes |
38.1 |
26.6 |
35.3 |
Total animals |
22 |
50.9 |
27.1 |
Mammals |
30.8 |
53.9 |
15.3 |
Reptiles |
15.3 |
54.3 |
30.4 |
Amphibians |
24.3 |
50.2 |
25.5 |
Fish |
15.1 |
27.4 |
57.5 |
Crustacea |
39.7 |
32.5 |
27.8 |
Molluscs |
22.3 |
52.9 |
24.8 |
Odonata |
26.0 |
33.8 |
40.2 |
Annelida |
18.2 |
40.9 |
40.9 |
Butterflies |
15.6 |
46.8 |
37.6 |
Orthoptera |
6.6 |
52.9 |
40.5 |
Coleoptera |
9.6 |
56.0 |
34.4 |
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
ALP |
26.7 |
48.2 |
25.0 |
PAN |
23.6 |
48.6 |
27.8 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Assessment of the conservation satus of EI species according to KIMS (as of 2021)
In 2021, 2,237 field visits of permanent monitoring sites were conducted under KIMS.
According to continuous monitoring results from KIMS, as of 2021, 25.6% species of EI were in a favourable condition, 48.8% species of EI in an unsatisfactory condition and 25.6% of species of EI in a bad condition.
Assessment of the conservation satus of EI species according to KIMS (as of 2020)
KIMS was supplemented in 2020 with 19,221 zoological, 23,431 botanical and 429 habitat occurrence records, including protected species. The occurrence of invasive plant species was also recorded in 738 observations.
Monitoring data in KIMS were supplemented in 2020 with 612 new records from permanent monitoring sites.
According to continuous monitoring results from KIMS, as of 2020, 25.5% species of EI were in a favourable condition, 48.4% species of EI in an unsatisfactory condition and 26.1% of species of EI in a bad condition.
Conservation status of EI species according to taxonomic groups in 2020 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
Total plants |
47.6 |
33.6 |
18.8 |
Higher plants |
51.2 |
36.3 |
12.5 |
Bryophytes |
38.1 |
26.6 |
35.3 |
Total animals |
22 |
50.7 |
27.3 |
Mammals |
30.9 |
53.5 |
15.6 |
Reptiles |
15.3 |
54.3 |
30.4 |
Amphibians |
24.4 |
49.8 |
25.8 |
Fish |
15.1 |
27.4 |
57.5 |
Crustacea |
38.8 |
32.7 |
28.5 |
Molluscs |
22.2 |
53.3 |
24.5 |
Odonata |
26.0 |
33.8 |
40.2 |
Annelida |
18.2 |
40.9 |
40.9 |
Butterflies |
15.6 |
46.8 |
37.6 |
Orthoptera |
6.6 |
52.9 |
40.5 |
Coleoptera |
9.6 |
56.0 |
34.4 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Conservation status of EI species by biogeographical regions in 2020 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
ALP |
26.5 |
48.4 |
25.1 |
PAN |
23.8 |
48.1 |
28.1 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Assessment of the conservation satus of EI species according to KIMS (as of 2019)
KIMS was supplemented in 2019 with 37,153 zoological, 45,594 botanical and 1,218 habitat occurrence records, including protected and invasive species. This represents an increase of more than 32% in the total number of occurrence records entered into KIMS in 2019 compared to the same period last year.
Conservation status of EI species according to taxonomic groups in 2019 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
Total plants |
47.7 |
33.4 |
18.9 |
Higher plants |
51.6 |
36.2 |
12.2 |
Bryophytes |
38.1 |
26.6 |
35.3 |
Total animals |
21.9 |
50.6 |
27.5 |
Mammals |
30.6 |
53.6 |
15.8 |
Reptiles |
15.3 |
54.3 |
30.4 |
Amphibians |
24.9 |
49.1 |
26.0 |
Fish |
16.0 |
27.0 |
57.0 |
Crustacea |
38.4 |
32.9 |
28.7 |
Molluscs |
22.2 |
52.8 |
25.0 |
Odonata |
26.0 |
33.8 |
40.2 |
Annelida |
14.3 |
42.9 |
42.8 |
Butterflies |
15.7 |
46.7 |
37.6 |
Orthoptera |
6.6 |
52.9 |
40.5 |
Coleoptera |
9.6 |
55.8 |
34.6 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Conservation status of EI species by biogeographical regions in 2019 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
ALP |
26.3 |
48.3 |
25.4 |
PAN |
23.6 |
47.9 |
28.5 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
According to continuous monitoring results from KIMS, as of 2018, 25.5% species of EI were in a favourable condition, 47.9% species of EI in an unsatisfactory condition and 26.6% of species of EI in a bad condition.
Conservation status of EI species according to taxonomic groups in 2018 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
Total plants |
48.3 |
32.6 |
19.1 |
Higher plants |
53.4 |
34.9 |
11.7 |
Bryophytes |
38.2 |
28.0 |
33.8 |
Total animals |
22.1 |
50.1 |
27.8 |
Mammals |
30.7 |
53.0 |
16.3 |
Reptiles |
14.6 |
54.6 |
30.8 |
Amphibians |
26.0 |
47.9 |
26.1 |
Fish |
16.3 |
24.9 |
58.8 |
Crustacea |
39.2 |
31.5 |
29.3 |
Molluscs |
24.0 |
51.7 |
24.3 |
Odonata |
27.4 |
34.1 |
38.5 |
Annelida |
12.1 |
39.4 |
48.5 |
Butterflies |
15.8 |
46.4 |
37.8 |
Orthoptera |
7.2 |
52.9 |
39.9 |
Coleoptera |
9.4 |
55.6 |
35.0 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Conservation status of EI species by biogeographical regions in 2018 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
ALP |
26.1 |
48.3 |
25.6 |
PAN |
24.2 |
46.7 |
29.1 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Assessment of the conservation satus of EI species according to KIMS (as of 2017)
According to continuous monitoring results from KIMS, as of 2017, 24.9% species of EI were in a favourable condition, 47.6% species of EI in an unsatisfactory condition and 27.5% of species of EI in a bad condition. Of these, 37.7% of bryophytes, 54.6% of higher plants and 21.6% of animals were in favourable condition by species group.
Conservation status of EI species according to taxonomic groups in 2017 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
Total plants |
48.5 |
31.9 |
19.6 |
Higher plants |
54.6 |
34.4 |
11.0 |
Bryophytes |
37.7 |
27.6 |
34.7 |
Total animals |
21.6 |
49.8 |
28.6 |
Mammals |
29.5 |
53.1 |
17.4 |
Reptiles |
13.8 |
54.8 |
31.4 |
Amphibians |
26.4 |
47.0 |
26.6 |
Fish |
17.3 |
23.4 |
59.3 |
Crustacea |
39.2 |
31.5 |
29.3 |
Molluscs |
23.9 |
51.5 |
24.6 |
Odonata |
27.9 |
33.4 |
38.7 |
Annelida |
6.9 |
41.4 |
51.7 |
Butterflies |
16.0 |
46.8 |
37.2 |
Orthoptera |
8.3 |
53.3 |
38.4 |
Coleoptera |
9.3 |
54.6 |
36.1 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Conservation status of EI species by biogeographical regions in 2017 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
ALP |
25.4 |
48.3 |
26.3 |
PAN |
24.1 |
45.7 |
30.2 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Assessment of the conservation satus of EI species according to KIMS (as of 2016)
According to continuous monitoring results from KIMS, as of 2016, 24.3% species were in a favourable condition, 47.5% species of EI in an unsatisfactory condition and 28.2% of species of EI in a bad condition. Out of that, according to the groups of species 30.8% of bryophytes, 53.3% of higher plants and 20.3% of animals were in a favourable condition.
Conservation status of EI species by biogeographical regions in 2016 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
ALP |
24.4 |
48.7 |
26.9 |
PAN |
24.2 |
44.7 |
31.1 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Assessment of the conservation satus of EI species according to KMS (as of 2015)
According to continuous monitoring results from KIMS, as of 2015, 22.5% species of EI were in a favourable condition, 47.7% species of EI in an unsatisfactory condition and 29.8% of species of EI in a bad condition. Out of that, according to the groups of species 35.7% of bryophytes, 53.2% of higher plants and 20.3% of animals were in a favourable condition.
Conservation status of EI species according to taxonomic groups in 2015 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
Total plants |
43.8 |
30.6 |
25.6 |
Higher plants |
53.2 |
34.1 |
12.7 |
Bryophytes |
35.7 |
27.6 |
36.7 |
Total animals |
20.3 |
49.5 |
30.2 |
Mammals |
26.2 |
54.6 |
19.2 |
Reptiles |
13 |
54.7 |
32.3 |
Amphibians |
28.6 |
44.2 |
27.2 |
Fish |
17.1 |
23.5 |
59.4 |
Crustacea |
39.2 |
31.5 |
29.3 |
Molluscs |
23.4 |
50.7 |
25.9 |
Odonata |
27.6 |
33.2 |
39.2 |
Annelida |
7.1 |
39.3 |
53.6 |
Butterflies |
15.7 |
47.9 |
36.4 |
Orthoptera |
8.5 |
50 |
41.5 |
Coleoptera |
8.6 |
53.6 |
37.8 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Conservation status of EI species by biogeographical regions in 2015 (%)
Favourable |
Unsatisfactory |
Bad |
|
ALP |
22.5 |
49.2 |
28.3 |
PAN |
22.6 |
44.4 |
33.0 |
Source: SNC SR (KIMS)
Chart: International comparison – Conservation status of species of EU importance
https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/daviz/proportion-of-species-assessments-in#tab-chart_1